

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Group 2: Suffixes that attach outside one other suffix (6 of 43)
المؤلف:
Ingo Plag
المصدر:
Morphological Productivity
الجزء والصفحة:
P84-C4
2025-01-16
1024
Group 2: Suffixes that attach outside one other suffix (6 of 43)
Fabb claims that the following six suffixes only attach to one other suffix, noun-forming -ary (attaches to -ion, as in revolutionary), adjective-forming -ary (with the same property, cf. revolutionary), denominal -er (attaches again only to -ion, as in vacationer), -ic (only occurs after -ist, as in modernistic), -(at)ory (only after -ify, as in modificatory), and deadjectival -y (only after -ent, as in residency).
As was the case with group 1 suffixes, Fabb's observations are empirically and theoretically flawed. With -ary, combinations involving -ate and -ment are also attested, as in commendatory, complementary, sacramentary, sedimentary, supplementary, which enlarges the number of possible suffixes preceding -ary to at least three. The same is true for adjective forming -ary, since most of the above forms are also used as adjectives.
Denominal -er (vacationer) attaches to quite a number of suffixes as the following examples show: adventurer, allegorister (rare), annoyancer, conveyancer, aphorismer (obsolete), assurancer, astromancer, astrologer1, baggager, bondager (Scottish), complimenter2, concordancer, con jecturer. Thus, -er may also be preceded at least by -ure, -ist, -ance, -ment, -age, and -ar.
Concerning -ic, Fabb's observation is empirically correct, counterexam ples are extremely rare (although geological agglomeratic may be one). The question, however, remains whether we are faced with a base-driven or with an affix-driven restriction. It seems that the constraint should be formulated as a base-driven requirement, i.e. as a property of -ist rather than as a property of -ic. If we say that -ist takes only -ic as an adjectival suffix, we explain the occurrence of not only -ist-ic, but also the obvious ungrammaticality of *-ist-al, *-ist-ive, *-ist-ent and the like. Again we see the empirical and theoretical advantage of a base-driven restriction over a suffix-driven one, since both legal and illegal combinations can be predicted.
Strangely enough, -(at)ory, Fabb's suffix [38], is also mentioned as a member of the group of suffixes that Fabb claims does not appear outside any suffixes. I have already pointed out that verbs in -ate productively take -ory as an adjectival suffix, and have argued for a base-driven constraint. On the same grounds we can state another base-driven restriction, namely that verbs in -ify regularly take -atory as an adjectival suffix (accompanied by an alternation of -ify into -ific, which is already familiar from -ion suffixation).
Fabb's claim that deadjectival abstract noun-forming -y only attaches to one adjectival suffix is not quite correct, since at least adjectives in -ate also take -y productively as the noun-forming suffix (accompanied by a change of the final plosive into a homorganic fricative). Consider intimacy, privacy, literacy, degeneracy, (con)federacy, accuracy, adequacy. Hence, a base-driven constraint is to be favored along the same lines as argued repetitively above.
To summarize our review of the suffixes that are claimed to attach only outside one other suffix, we can say that, with the exception of -ic, all of them attach to at least two other suffixes. Furthermore, the base-driven selectional restrictions suggested here to replace Fabb's restrictions have been shown to be superior in their predictive power. This group of suffixes does not form a homogeneous class at all. In fact, it seems strange to posit a class of suffixes on the basis of the number of suffixes to which they attach. Since very specific idiosyncratic selectional restrictions have to be posited anyway, nothing is gained for a theory of derivational morphology by generalizing over the number of such idiosyncrasies.
1 The forms attested in the OED suggest that the combination -log-er has competed with -log-ist for quite some time, with the latter having now superseded the former in most of the cases.
2 The primary stress on the first syllable suggests a denominal origin since -er is a stress-neutral suffix.
الاكثر قراءة في Morphology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)