

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Strategies for syntactic processing
المؤلف:
Paul Warren
المصدر:
Introducing Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P164
2025-11-09
319
Strategies for syntactic processing
The preceding sections have presented summaries of a few issues in sentence complexity and in syntactic marking that have implications for the syntactic processing of sentences. How, then, do we carry out the processing of sentences How do we build sentences using the input words It seems that there are some basic observations that need to be taken into account.
One is that discontinuous constituents are difficult to process. Compare the sentences in (10.32)– (10.34_. The more material that intervenes between a and, the more difficult it is to process the sentence.
Of course, sentences like (10.34), though grammatically permissible, would normally be avoided or expressed differently. The problem with such sentences is that when we encounter the word it is disconnected from what we have read or heard just prior to that point. It seems that we package up the constituents that we read or hear, and a no longer belongs together as a single constituent.
Another observation is that native speakers seem to have clear preferences in the structures they assign to sentences. The same is probably true of non-native speakers, though less is known about their approaches to the processing of sentences (Frenck-Mestre, 2005 ; Nitschke, Kidd & Serratrice, 2010). Although (10.35) is unambiguous, it is problematic. Most readers do a double-take, and have to go back and read the sentence again to get the right analysis. By contrast, (10.36) is ambiguous, but it is often hard to detect the ambiguity which involves the relationship of o s to the preceding material – did Pat buy the book for Chris or had I been trying to find it for Chris?)
It is argued that these effects come about because human sentence processing automatically builds the words of a sentence into particular preferred structures, so that for instance the adverb ese a at the end of (10.35) is attached to the most recent verb phrase, despite the fact that the phrase is marked for future but ese a indicates past.
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)