

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Hybrid accounts
المؤلف:
Paul Warren
المصدر:
Introducing Psycholinguistics
الجزء والصفحة:
P194
2025-11-11
349
Hybrid accounts
An alternative to both the garden path GP model and the constraint-based approaches introduced above is the unrestricted race model (for further discussion see Van Gompel & Pickering, 2007). This model proposes that when an ambiguous sentence is encountered, the various possible analyses are involved in a race, with the winner being the analysis that is built fast est. The speed with which an analysis is constructed depends on the strength of the information supporting it, and so from this point of view it is similar to constraint-based models and unlike the GP model, which assumes a single syntactic analysis is pursued. Like the GP model, however, it assumes that a syntactic analysis is built before it is evaluated on the basis of plausibility. The model also differs from the constraint-based models in that it assumes no competition between the different analyses.
These three model types GP, constraint-based, unrestricted race make different predictions about the set of sentences in (11.64)–(11.66), where the structural ambiguity concerns whether e modifies the first or second full NP (e.g. the bodyguard or the governor in (11.64)). First, the GP model predicts a preferred syntactic analysis of attaching the modifying phrase to the second NP, just as was seen earlier for relative clause attachment ambiguities see p. 192. This would mean that both sentence (11.64) and sentence (11.66) would be straightforward, since this syntactic preference is not contradicted by the subsequent semantic interpretation. In (11.65), however, the attachment of retiring to the province will present an anomaly to the semantic interpreter. Second, constraint-based models predict that since both resolutions of the ambiguity remain possible in (11.64), these will be in competition with one another, making this sentence more difficult to process than (11.65) and (11.66), which are semantically disambiguated only the governor can retire, not the province.
Finally, however, the unrestricted race model predicts that the globally ambiguous sentence in (11.64) will be easier than the sentences in (11.65) and (11.66). In all three cases, the model predicts that each syntactic analysis is developed, but the fastest one will be selected. In (11.64) the processor will sometimes come up with one analysis, and sometimes with the other, but in neither case is there any conflict with a subsequent plausibility analysis as both interpretations are possible. In the case of the disambiguated sentences in (11.65) and (11.66), the syntactic processor similarly sometimes reaches one analysis and sometimes the other, and some of the time this will be contradicted by the plausibility analysis, so that overall (11.65) and (11.66) should throw up more processing problems than (11.64). In a study measuring eye movements during the reading of such sentences, Van Gompel et al. (2005) found precisely this result – (11.64) was easier to read than the others.
الاكثر قراءة في Linguistics fields
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)