Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
The Medieval context
المؤلف:
Heinz Bergner
المصدر:
The historical; perspective in pragmatics
الجزء والصفحة:
39-2
19-4-2022
495
The Medieval context
Apart from the openness that is intrinsic to every era, the kind of linguistic openness dealt with here is a specific and restricted vagueness typically only found in medieval texts. First, a well-known truth needs to be pointed out: medieval discourse, which will be mainly discussed here on the basis of Old English and Middle English texts, is only accessible through the written medium; the oral dimension can at best be revealed by questionable reconstructions and will never be completely accessible. Reflecting, in addition to this, on the openness of medieval utterances, we have in mind a certain openness that presented itself to the speaker/writer or listener/reader of that time as an entirely natural accompanying phenomenon of his linguistic environment. To the present-day beholder this appears rather odd. In any case, it is recommendable to distinguish the medieval perspective from the present-day one. In general, it can be stated that the Middle Ages had no concept of itself, neither of its temporal nor of its notional dimension. This is shown by the extremely discrepant notions of world and history of this era. Thus, it is also generally true that the Middle Ages do not know unequivocal categories (Borst 1979; Duby 1984; Gerhards 1986; Boockmann 1988), which is documented not only by medieval institutions and philosophic principles but also by artistic and linguistic utterances of this period. This can be briefly explained with the help of two examples. In the English Middle Ages, there is, for instance, no political order that could claim the quality of a general political system in connection with universally accepted theoretical foundations. The same fact is supported by another example. It is known that the church service is, among other things, the center of medieval religious experience. The essential text of the mass liturgy, however, is reflected in a variety of fairly different versions, which resulted in completely different mass liturgies being used often in the very same place.
Another condition for the basic openness of medieval linguistic utterances requires explicit mentioning. The medieval way of thinking and talking is used to perceiving each detail of existence not in an isolated way, but always in its relation to spiritual values, this, however, often in free decision and with a choice of certain second, third and other meanings. In this way, it is true that the individual linguistic sign refers to a known every-day referent, but usually also to another referential dimension which is not predetermined and only vaguely related to spiritual conventions. This referential dimension is shown in allegorical, tropological and anagogical interpretations (Lubac 1959-64). In this context the etymologicalizing procedure of medieval thinking and talking can be subsumed. In a free etymological decision of analysis - etymological not from a modern viewpoint, but only in the sense of general theological concepts – this procedure consists in creating a relationship between the signifiant of a linguistic sign and a similarly sounding word that spiritually elevates the former (Schwarz et al 1988: 207-260; Harms 1993). In the Middle Ages there is no binding system regulating this procedure for all persons involved, at best there are different theological hints and practices. Consequently, however, this results in a strange amorphousness of the individual linguistic sign, both with regard to its phonetic structure as well as to its content.
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
