

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Whose meaning?
المؤلف:
Jonathan Culpeper and Michael Haugh
المصدر:
Pragmatics and the English Language
الجزء والصفحة:
119-5
9-5-2022
1009
Whose meaning?
The primary focus of many scholars in analyzing pragmatic meaning has been on representations of speaker meaning. We point out that speaker meaning is much more complex than might appear at first. Indeed, it constitutes just one of a number of threads we need to consider in any analysis of pragmatic meaning, since what has been relatively neglected in many accounts of pragmatic meaning thus far is just whose meaning representation is at issue, in other words, the perspective of the user.
It is generally assumed that it is speakers who mean things, while hearers are the ones who figure out what speakers are meaning in or through what they say. However, a focus on speaker meaning can inadvertently mask two quite different perspectives: that of the speaker and that of the hearer. According to Grice, the notion of conversational implicature, for instance, is simply what the speaker makes available to hearers through maintaining the assumption that Cooperative Principle is being observed. The conversational implicatum (or implicata in the plural) that speakers and recipients actually entertain are thus regarded as a distinct matter, as we discussed. There was subsequently, however, a general move in pragmatics towards analyzing the hearer’s representation of the speaker’s intended meaning representation, particularly amongst Relevance theorists (and other contextualists), who analyze speaker meaning from the perspective of the hearer’s reconstruction of it via their inferences about speaker’s intended meaning. There is thus an underlying assumption that in “successful communication” the speaker’s intended meaning (e.g. an implicature) and the hearer’s inference about it (e.g. an implicatum) can be treated as if they are virtually synonymous (Carston 2002; Sperber and Wilson [1986]1995; see also Levinson 2000).
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)