Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
Whose meaning?
المؤلف:
Jonathan Culpeper and Michael Haugh
المصدر:
Pragmatics and the English Language
الجزء والصفحة:
119-5
9-5-2022
723
Whose meaning?
The primary focus of many scholars in analyzing pragmatic meaning has been on representations of speaker meaning. We point out that speaker meaning is much more complex than might appear at first. Indeed, it constitutes just one of a number of threads we need to consider in any analysis of pragmatic meaning, since what has been relatively neglected in many accounts of pragmatic meaning thus far is just whose meaning representation is at issue, in other words, the perspective of the user.
It is generally assumed that it is speakers who mean things, while hearers are the ones who figure out what speakers are meaning in or through what they say. However, a focus on speaker meaning can inadvertently mask two quite different perspectives: that of the speaker and that of the hearer. According to Grice, the notion of conversational implicature, for instance, is simply what the speaker makes available to hearers through maintaining the assumption that Cooperative Principle is being observed. The conversational implicatum (or implicata in the plural) that speakers and recipients actually entertain are thus regarded as a distinct matter, as we discussed. There was subsequently, however, a general move in pragmatics towards analyzing the hearer’s representation of the speaker’s intended meaning representation, particularly amongst Relevance theorists (and other contextualists), who analyze speaker meaning from the perspective of the hearer’s reconstruction of it via their inferences about speaker’s intended meaning. There is thus an underlying assumption that in “successful communication” the speaker’s intended meaning (e.g. an implicature) and the hearer’s inference about it (e.g. an implicatum) can be treated as if they are virtually synonymous (Carston 2002; Sperber and Wilson [1986]1995; see also Levinson 2000).
الاكثر قراءة في pragmatics
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
