Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
New York, Philadelphia, and other northern cities: phonology
المؤلف:
Matthew J. Gordon
المصدر:
A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
282-16
2024-03-18
1012
New York, Philadelphia, and other northern cities: phonology
We will describe characteristic features of accents heard in some of the largest cities in the United States. The discussion considers two eastern cities, New York and Philadelphia, as well as the area around the Great Lakes which includes Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, and Buffalo. In terms of the traditional dialectological classification, these locations represent a mixture of dialects (Kurath 1949). Philadelphia is squarely within the Midland region, while New York City is grouped as part of the North but is seen as constituting its own subregion. The Great Lakes area represents the core of the Inland North, a subregion of Northern speech that stretches from western New England to roughly the Mississippi River.
Compared to other varieties in the U.S. and elsewhere, the dialects discussed here have been studied quite extensively by linguists. This is particularly true in the case of New York which has attracted regular dialectological interest since Babbitt’s 1896 report (e.g., Hubbell 1950; Thomas 1942). Much of the research on New York speech, as well as on that of Philadelphia and the Inland North, has focussed on the kinds of traditional features studied by dialect geographers. This information is valuable, but a description of contemporary speech patterns will also benefit from a more dynamic perspective, one that considers changing usage of older features as well as adoption of recent innovations. For this reason, much of the description here relies on sociolinguistic research, especially the work of William Labov who has written on New York City (1966), Philadelphia (2001), and the changes operating in the Inland North (Labov, Ash and Boberg fc.). Sociolinguistic research of this type is particularly well suited to the investigation of the speech of large urban areas because it examines a broad spectrum of the community of speakers rather than concentrating on any one segment of society. Still, even the best sociolinguistic studies cannot fully consider the rich social diversity of the populations of major cities like those discussed here. As a general caveat, therefore, it should be noted that the features described below characterize the speech of some, but certainly not all, people of these areas.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
