Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Semiotics
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
Teaching Methods
Teaching Strategies
The phonetic and phonological status of the U.S.-Canada border
المؤلف:
Charles Boberg
المصدر:
A Handbook Of Varieties Of English Phonology
الجزء والصفحة:
362-20
2024-03-28
1012
The phonetic and phonological status of the U.S.-Canada border
Avis (1954–56) and Chambers (1994), among others, have shown how the international boundary between Ontario and the U.S. is a sharp linguistic isogloss for a wide range of variables at different levels of grammar, even though Avis (1954: 13) suggests that, from a broader perspective, the differences between Ontario speech and adjacent parts of the United States are minimal. However, these studies have generally dealt with non-phonetic data. The question of the linguistic significance of the U.S.-Canada border at the level of phonetics and phonology – and especially at the level of the vowel sounds that make up our primary impression of the regional character of someone’s speech – has only now begun to be systematically investigated (Labov, Ash, and Boberg, fc.; Boberg 2000).
In general, phonological and phonetic data indicate a border effect that diminishes in importance from east to west. In the east, the completely different phonological systems of Eastern New England and Maritime Canada are directly opposed across the international border. Though both regions share a low-back merger and a conservative treatment of /u:/ and /oʊ/ , eastern Canada was not affected by the Southern British innovations – vocalization of /r/ and the split of Middle English /a – that shaped modern Eastern New England speech. This fact helps in the dating of these changes in New England, since Nova Scotia was settled by New Englanders: it seems likely that the changes became general after the emigration of New Englanders to Canada in the mid-18th century.
In the middle of the continent, the border between Canadian speech in Ontario and Inland Northern speech on the other side of the Great Lakes is remarkably sharp. It separates two different phonological systems, along with the phonetic developments that follow from them. On the Canadian side, a low-back merger has produced a backing of /æ/ in the Canadian Shift; on the American side, a low-back distinction has been preserved by a raising of /æ/ and a centralization of /ɒ/ in the Northern Cities Shift. Boberg (2000) showed that there was no sign of phonetic or phonological interference across the Detroit River between Detroit, Michigan, and Windsor, Ontario, despite the prediction of current models of geolinguistic diffusion that Windsor would be linguistically assimilated to its much larger American neighbor, not to speak of the importance of American settlement in the origins of Ontario English.
In western North America, however, the international boundary no longer represents a coherent bundle of isoglosses, with the exception that it marks the southern extent of Canadian raising (especially of /aʊ/ ) and of more extreme versions of the Canadian shift. Western North America, to a large extent, shares a common phonological system and very similar phonetics. The blurring of linguistic boundaries in the West, a well-established fact in American dialectology, is not merely a feature of American English, but of the continent as a whole, reflecting relatively sparse and recent settlement from a mixture of sources. People living in Saskatchewan and North Dakota, Alberta and Montana, or British Columbia and Washington can certainly hear a difference between their own speech and that of their neighbors across the border, but this difference would seem very small indeed to someone from outside the region.
Notwithstanding the varying border effects discussed above, it must be admitted that certain changes in North American English seem to be diffusing rapidly over most of the continent, including Canada. One of these, discussed above, is the fronting of /u:/. Others include the loss of /j/ in /ju:/ after coronals (news, student, tube, etc.), the merger of /hw/ and /w/ (whether vs. weather, etc.), and the spread of be like as a verb of quotation (I was like, what’s up with that?). Moreover, the mass media, which are essentially common to all of North America, spread lexical innovations rapidly across the border, thereby further leveling the differences between Canadian and American English. It remains to be seen which differences will ultimately survive this erosion, and which new differences will arise to take the place of obsolete ones as people on each side of the border strive to sustain linguistic symbols of their sense of community.
الاكثر قراءة في Phonology
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

الآخبار الصحية
