 
					
					
						Crystal Field Stabilization Energies					
				 
				
					
						 المؤلف:  
						..................
						 المؤلف:  
						..................					
					
						 المصدر:  
						LibreTexts Project
						 المصدر:  
						LibreTexts Project					
					
						 الجزء والصفحة:  
						.................
						 الجزء والصفحة:  
						.................					
					
					
						 23-6-2019
						23-6-2019
					
					
						 1929
						1929					
				 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
			 
			
			
				
				Crystal Field Stabilization Energies
Recall that stable molecules contain more electrons in the lower-energy (bonding) molecular orbitals in a molecular orbital diagram than in the higher-energy (antibonding) molecular orbitals. If the lower-energy set of d orbitals (the t2g orbitals) is selectively populated by electrons, then the stability of the complex increases. For example, the single d electron in a d1 complex such as [Ti(H2O)6]3+ is located in one of the t2g orbitals. Consequently, this complex will be more stable than expected on purely electrostatic grounds by 0.4Δo. The additional stabilization of a metal complex by selective population of the lower-energy d orbitals is called its crystal field stabilization energy (CFSE). The CFSE of a complex can be calculated by multiplying the number of electrons in t2g orbitals by the energy of those orbitals (−0.4Δo), multiplying the number of electrons in eg orbitals by the energy of those orbitals (+0.6Δo), and summing the two. Table 1.1 gives CFSE values for octahedral complexes with different d electron configurations. The CFSE is highest for low-spin d6 complexes, which accounts in part for the extraordinarily large number of Co(III) complexes known. The other low-spin configurations also have high CFSEs, as does the d3 configuration.
	
	Table 1.1 : CFSEs for Octahedral Complexes with Different Electron Configurations (in Units of Δo)
	
	
		
			|  | High Spin | CFSE (Δo) | Low Spin | CFSE (Δo) | 
	
	
		
			| d 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 
		
			| d 1 | ↿ |  | 0.4 |  |  |  | 
		
			| d 2 | ↿ ↿ |  | 0.8 |  |  |  | 
		
			| d 3 | ↿ ↿ ↿ |  | 1.2 |  |  |  | 
		
			| d 4 | ↿ ↿ ↿ | ↿ | 0.6 | ↿⇂ ↿ ↿ |  | 1.6 | 
		
			| d 5 | ↿ ↿ ↿ | ↿ ↿ | 0.0 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿ |  | 2.0 | 
		
			| d 6 | ↿⇂ ↿ ↿ | ↿ ↿ | 0.4 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿⇂ |  | 2.4 | 
		
			| d 7 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿ | ↿ ↿ | 0.8 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿⇂ | ↿ | 1.8 | 
		
			| d 8 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿⇂ | ↿ ↿ | 1.2 |  |  |  | 
		
			| d 9 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿⇂ | ↿⇂ ↿ | 0.6 |  |  |  | 
		
			| d 10 | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ ↿⇂ | ↿⇂ ↿⇂ | 0.0 |  |  |  | 
	
CFSEs are important for two reasons. First, the existence of CFSE nicely accounts for the difference between experimentally measured values for bond energies in metal complexes and values calculated based solely on electrostatic interactions. Second, CFSEs represent relatively large amounts of energy (up to several hundred kilojoules per mole), which has important chemical consequences.
Octahedral d3 and d8 complexes and low-spin d6, d5, d7, and d4 complexes exhibit large CFSEs.
				
				
					
					 الاكثر قراءة في  كيمياء العناصر الانتقالية ومركباتها المعقدة
					 الاكثر قراءة في  كيمياء العناصر الانتقالية ومركباتها المعقدة					
					
				 
				
				
					
					 اخر الاخبار
						اخر الاخبار
					
					
						
							  اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة