Pictograms and ideograms

Cave drawings may serve to record some event (e.g. Humans 3, Buffaloes 1), but they are not usually thought of as any type of specifically linguistic message. They are usually treated as part of a tradition of pictorial art. When some of the “pictures” came to represent particular images in a consistent way, we can begin to describe the product as a form of picture-writing, or pictograms. In this way, a form such asmight come to be used for the sun. An essential part of this use of a representative symbol is that everyone should use a similar form to convey a roughly similar meaning. That is, a conventional relationship must exist between the symbol and its interpretation.

In time, this picture might develop into a more fixed symbolic form, such as, and come to be used for “heat” and “daytime,” as well as for “sun.” Note that as the symbol extends from “sun” to “heat,” it is moving from something visible to something conceptual (and no longer a picture). This type of symbol is then considered to be 212 The Study of Language part of a system of idea-writing, or ideograms. The distinction between pictograms and ideograms is essentially a difference in the relationship between the symbol and the entity it represents. The more “picture-like” forms are pictograms and the more abstract derived forms are ideograms.

A key property of both pictograms and ideograms is that they do not represent words or sounds in a particular language. Modern pictograms, such as those represented in the accompanying illustration, are language-independent and can be understood with much the same basic conventional meaning in a lot of different places where a number of different languages are spoken.

It is generally thought that there were pictographic or ideographic origins for a large number of symbols that turn up in later writing systems. For example, in Egyptian hieroglyphics, the symbol was used to refer to a house and derived from the diagram-like representation of the floor plan of a house. In Chinese writing, the character was used for a river, and had its origins in the pictorial representation of a stream flowing between two banks. However, it is important to note that neither the Egyptian nor the Chinese written symbols are actually “pictures” of a house or a river. They are more abstract. When we create symbols in a writing system, there is always an abstraction away from the physical world.

When the relationship between the symbol and the entity or idea becomes sufficiently abstract, we can be more confident that the symbol is probably being used to represent words in a language. In early Egyptian writing, the ideogram for water was. Much later, the derived symbol came to be used for the actual word meaning “water.” When symbols are used to represent words in a language, they are described as examples of word-writing, or “logograms.”

اخر الاخبار

اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة

متحف الكفيل يُنفِّذ أعمال الإدامة الدورية لقاعة العرض المتحفي

معهد تراث الأنبياء يختتم دورته العلمية الأولى في علوم القرآن الكريم

ملاكات قسم الشؤون الخدمية تنفّذ حملة تعفيرٍ شاملة لقسم المضيف ومرافقه الخدمية

يتضمن محاضرة حول كتاب نهج البلاغة.. المجمع العلمي يقيم برنامجه العبادي الأسبوعي في كربلاء

المزيد

الآخبار الصحية

نظام غذائي شائع قد يؤدي إلى ارتفاع الكوليسترول الضار

تحذيرات هامة من عواقب تناول "أيبوبروفين" مع أدوية شائعة

علامات مبكرة للإيبولا يمكن الخلط بينها وبين الإنفلونزا

خبراء: الفيروسات مثل هانتا وإيبولا أصبحت أكثر شيوعا وفتكاً

المزيد

الآخبار التكنلوجية

الليلة.. هلال القمر يلتقي كوكبي الزهرة والمشتري

إيلون ماسك يخسر دعواه القضائية أمام أوبن إيه.آي

مهمة فضائية "أوروبية صينية" لكشف أسرار الرياح الشمسية

انتهاء رحلة "السفينة الموبوءة".. وهذا مصير من بقي على متنها

المزيد

مواضيع ذات صلة

The Reader Knows Little or Nothing

The Reader Knows the Old and the New

DESCRIBING CHANGES TO PROCESSES

Dealing with Alternative Solutions

Proposing Steps to Solve Problems

DIFFICULT INTRODUCTORY FORMS

Our solution has not worked, what should we do?

Which alternative should we choose?

Do we have a problem?

How should we do what we want to do?

Should we do what we are thinking about doing?

COMMON PATTERNS OF INTRODUCTION