

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Results, Analysis and Discussion
المؤلف:
Sherria Hoskins & Carolyne Jacobs & Heather MacKenzie
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P192-C17
2025-07-04
527
Results, Analysis and Discussion
Pearson Correlation Analyses were conducted to determine correlations between age and factor scores. Age was found to significantly positively correlate with the score on Factor 2: Higher Academic Skills (r = .120, n = 1166, p < 0.001, two-tailed). Correlations with Factor 5: verbal Communication were also positive (r = .173, n = 1171, p < 0.001, two-tailed). These relationships would suggest that as student's age increases, they show higher confidence levels in areas designated as higher academic skills and verbal communication.
Students were then categorized as traditional age (aged 20 or younger, N = 1005) or mature age (aged 21 and over, N = 168). An independent t-test was undertaken to determine the likelihood that a difference between the two groups was due to chance (a significant result would indicate that the difference is unlikely to be due to chance). This test revealed that mature students (mean = 24.45, s.d. = 3.42) scored significantly higher on Factor 2: Higher Academic Skills than traditional age students (mean = 23.78, s.d. = 2.92) (t = -2.376, df = 210.191, p < 0.05). Mature students (mean = 14.62, s.d. = 2.50) also scored significantly higher on Factor 5: Verbal Communication than traditional age students (mean = 13.79, s.d. = 2.38) (t = -4.167, df = 1169, p < 0.001). However, traditional age students (mean = 19. 31, s.d = 4.00) scored significantly higher on Factor 3: IT (t = 3.494, df = 1164, p < 0.001) than mature students (mean = 18.13, s.d. = 4.38). This indicates that mature students display more confidence about their higher level academic skills and their verbal communication skills than traditional age students, but are less confident in IT-related areas. However, existing research indicates that actual skills are not deficient in mature students, this appears only to be the case in adults aged over 60 who are not in higher education (e.g. Hoskins & Hoof, 2005; Chmielewski, 1998; Morrell et, al., 2000).
Bandura (1977) suggests that although previous successful experience may inform greater long-term self-efficacy, if self-efficacy is low there will be correspondingly low levels of effort and performance. For example, self-efficacy relating to information technology skills varies significantly across populations; low assessment outcomes may be the result of low self-efficacy rather than actual potential ability. Similarly, the assessments that involve effective communication skills may be subject to similar influences.
A univariate ANOVA test was used to compare factor scores for different types of courses (Honors degree, Foundation degree, HND, CertHE) to determine whether the differences in factor scores between multiple groups were unlikely to have occurred by chance. The type of course had a significant effect on Factor 2 (Higher Academic Skills) scores (F(3, 1162) = 3.361, p < 0.05). Foundation degree students (mean = 25.21) scored significantly higher than Honors degree students (mean = 23.83) on Factor 2 (p < 0.05), indicating that students on foundation degrees are more confident than honors degree students on these skills. It had been anticipated that the reason for this relationship was because most students studying Foundation Degrees are mature entrants. However, an ANOVA demonstrated that the impact of course type on ILP scores did not interact with the impact of age on ILP scores. Further research is required to examine the factors that impact on levels of confidence and achievement for these particular students. Foundation Degree students generally have significant work and life experience which may have enabled them to develop their communication skills. However, there are other factors, which may impact on their levels of confidence in other areas and subsequently effect levels of achievement.
الاكثر قراءة في Teaching Strategies
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)