

Grammar


Tenses


Present

Present Simple

Present Continuous

Present Perfect

Present Perfect Continuous


Past

Past Simple

Past Continuous

Past Perfect

Past Perfect Continuous


Future

Future Simple

Future Continuous

Future Perfect

Future Perfect Continuous


Parts Of Speech


Nouns

Countable and uncountable nouns

Verbal nouns

Singular and Plural nouns

Proper nouns

Nouns gender

Nouns definition

Concrete nouns

Abstract nouns

Common nouns

Collective nouns

Definition Of Nouns

Animate and Inanimate nouns

Nouns


Verbs

Stative and dynamic verbs

Finite and nonfinite verbs

To be verbs

Transitive and intransitive verbs

Auxiliary verbs

Modal verbs

Regular and irregular verbs

Action verbs

Verbs


Adverbs

Relative adverbs

Interrogative adverbs

Adverbs of time

Adverbs of place

Adverbs of reason

Adverbs of quantity

Adverbs of manner

Adverbs of frequency

Adverbs of affirmation

Adverbs


Adjectives

Quantitative adjective

Proper adjective

Possessive adjective

Numeral adjective

Interrogative adjective

Distributive adjective

Descriptive adjective

Demonstrative adjective


Pronouns

Subject pronoun

Relative pronoun

Reflexive pronoun

Reciprocal pronoun

Possessive pronoun

Personal pronoun

Interrogative pronoun

Indefinite pronoun

Emphatic pronoun

Distributive pronoun

Demonstrative pronoun

Pronouns


Pre Position


Preposition by function

Time preposition

Reason preposition

Possession preposition

Place preposition

Phrases preposition

Origin preposition

Measure preposition

Direction preposition

Contrast preposition

Agent preposition


Preposition by construction

Simple preposition

Phrase preposition

Double preposition

Compound preposition

prepositions


Conjunctions

Subordinating conjunction

Correlative conjunction

Coordinating conjunction

Conjunctive adverbs

conjunctions


Interjections

Express calling interjection

Phrases

Sentences


Grammar Rules

Passive and Active

Preference

Requests and offers

wishes

Be used to

Some and any

Could have done

Describing people

Giving advices

Possession

Comparative and superlative

Giving Reason

Making Suggestions

Apologizing

Forming questions

Since and for

Directions

Obligation

Adverbials

invitation

Articles

Imaginary condition

Zero conditional

First conditional

Second conditional

Third conditional

Reported speech

Demonstratives

Determiners


Linguistics

Phonetics

Phonology

Linguistics fields

Syntax

Morphology

Semantics

pragmatics

History

Writing

Grammar

Phonetics and Phonology

Semiotics


Reading Comprehension

Elementary

Intermediate

Advanced


Teaching Methods

Teaching Strategies

Assessment
Learning methods
المؤلف:
Rob Cowdroy & Anthony Williams
المصدر:
Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment
الجزء والصفحة:
P92-C9
2025-06-15
734
Learning methods
Increasing emphasis on both facilitative thinking ability and thinking task ability (discussed above) requires that multiple levels of thinking ability are developed in each student, requiring multiple learning methods (Gibbs, 1995). Lower-level task abilities represent foundation abilities within any given program, and typically require linear thinking and relatively simple behavioral responses (e.g. processing data, answering questions, writing synoptic reports, making analogue (e.g. numerical) tables, graphics and models). Appropriate learning methods for lower-level task ability include conventional rote, recognition and repetition (RRR) methods.
Mid-level task abilities broadly represent the supporting diagnostic and problem-solving abilities in a practitioner, and typically involve lateral thinking to relate observed phenomena to set knowledge and abstract theoretical frameworks. These are more complex behavioral responses, including domain specific dialectic, diagnosis and debate (DDD). This requires a significant shift towards student-centred heuristic learning (learning by individual searching and experimenting). Case-study based cognitive apprenticeship learning strategies, for instance, have been very successful in developing mid-level task abilities.
Higher-level task abilities are typically technical and professional "expertise" abilities (e.g. complex creative architectural design; complex medical prognosis) and involve significantly more complex behavior including "professional" approaches to prognostic/design projections, multiple alternative options, and development of criteria for selection of a "best" complex outcome and "best" complex strategy for achieving that. Effective learning strategies for higher-level task abilities are characteristically heuristic and increasingly research-and-development (R&D) oriented (i.e. closely related to the way an expert practices) with extensive praxis, often in simulated practice environments and some problem-based learning, integrated-learning and research-based learning approaches.
A further important consideration is that individual students, in addition to having differing learning abilities also learn at differing rates: our research shows that within any class or cohort, a majority can be expected to be "good to excellent", a minority can be expected to be "struggling", and a further small minority can be expected to be "outstanding". For present discussion, "outstanding" students are those few who exhibit exceptional ability akin to genius that transcends the expected outcomes.
"Struggling" students typically exhibit high early rates of progress (learning curve) until they reach their (low) ability plateau, and then exhibit little further progress; "good to excellent" students typically exhibit a high early rate of progress, an extended plateau, and a further high rate of progress approaching a deadline; "outstanding" students typically exhibit a low rate of progress (an extended low plateau) until close to a deadline and then an exceptionally high rate of progress.
Ideally, in order to accommodate the struggling students, good to excellent students and outstanding students equitably, differing rates of learning should be accommodated within an overall learning strategy, such as through flexible timetabling and flexible criteria frameworks (Cowdroy & Mauffette, 2003; Crick & Cowdroy, 1999).
In any given course or program that is intended to develop higher-level task abilities, therefore, a combination of learning strategies such as RRR, DDD and R&D should be engaged, in conjunction with flexible timetabling and flexible criteria frameworks to accommodate students' varying learning patterns.
الاكثر قراءة في Teaching Strategies
اخر الاخبار
اخبار العتبة العباسية المقدسة
الآخبار الصحية

قسم الشؤون الفكرية يصدر كتاباً يوثق تاريخ السدانة في العتبة العباسية المقدسة
"المهمة".. إصدار قصصي يوثّق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة فتوى الدفاع المقدسة للقصة القصيرة
(نوافذ).. إصدار أدبي يوثق القصص الفائزة في مسابقة الإمام العسكري (عليه السلام)