Grammar
Tenses
Present
Present Simple
Present Continuous
Present Perfect
Present Perfect Continuous
Past
Past Continuous
Past Perfect
Past Perfect Continuous
Past Simple
Future
Future Simple
Future Continuous
Future Perfect
Future Perfect Continuous
Passive and Active
Parts Of Speech
Nouns
Countable and uncountable nouns
Verbal nouns
Singular and Plural nouns
Proper nouns
Nouns gender
Nouns definition
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Common nouns
Collective nouns
Definition Of Nouns
Verbs
Stative and dynamic verbs
Finite and nonfinite verbs
To be verbs
Transitive and intransitive verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal verbs
Regular and irregular verbs
Action verbs
Adverbs
Relative adverbs
Interrogative adverbs
Adverbs of time
Adverbs of place
Adverbs of reason
Adverbs of quantity
Adverbs of manner
Adverbs of frequency
Adverbs of affirmation
Adjectives
Quantitative adjective
Proper adjective
Possessive adjective
Numeral adjective
Interrogative adjective
Distributive adjective
Descriptive adjective
Demonstrative adjective
Pronouns
Subject pronoun
Relative pronoun
Reflexive pronoun
Reciprocal pronoun
Possessive pronoun
Personal pronoun
Interrogative pronoun
Indefinite pronoun
Emphatic pronoun
Distributive pronoun
Demonstrative pronoun
Pre Position
Preposition by function
Time preposition
Reason preposition
Possession preposition
Place preposition
Phrases preposition
Origin preposition
Measure preposition
Direction preposition
Contrast preposition
Agent preposition
Preposition by construction
Simple preposition
Phrase preposition
Double preposition
Compound preposition
Conjunctions
Subordinating conjunction
Correlative conjunction
Coordinating conjunction
Conjunctive adverbs
Interjections
Express calling interjection
Grammar Rules
Preference
Requests and offers
wishes
Be used to
Some and any
Could have done
Describing people
Giving advices
Possession
Comparative and superlative
Giving Reason
Making Suggestions
Apologizing
Forming questions
Since and for
Directions
Obligation
Adverbials
invitation
Articles
Imaginary condition
Zero conditional
First conditional
Second conditional
Third conditional
Reported speech
Linguistics
Phonetics
Phonology
Semantics
Pragmatics
Linguistics fields
Syntax
Morphology
Semantics
pragmatics
History
Writing
Grammar
Phonetics and Phonology
Reading Comprehension
Elementary
Intermediate
Advanced
A thematic analysis of DP
المؤلف:
RICHARD LARSON AND HIROKO YAMAKIDO
المصدر:
Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse
الجزء والصفحة:
P50-C3
2025-04-06
56
A thematic analysis of DP
In DP quantification, the set Y is normally given by the internal argument of D: the nominal that D combines with, usually referred to as “the restriction on quantification.” The set X is given by the external argument of D: the expression that DP is adjoined to, usually called “the scope of quantification.” Larson (2000c) suggests that notions like scope and restriction be understood as thematic roles assigned by determiners to their set arguments, and ordered into a hierachy as shown in (1a). On this proposal, there is a hierarchy of Ë-roles for D, parallel to, but distinct from, the hierarchy of Ë-roles for V (1b).
The parallel thematic analysis of D and V allows for a parallel account of structure. In the shell theory of Larson (1988, forthcoming), transitive VPs receive a simple binary branching structure (2a), whereas ditransitive Vs receive a structure containing a phonetically null “light verb” that triggers V-raising (2b).
In both cases, arguments appearing higher in structure (as expressed by c-command) receive Ë-roles that are correspondingly higher on the thematic hierarchy.
In a similar way, DPs can be assigned a structure that reflects the thematic hierarchy for D. Simple quantificational DPs correspond to transitive structures and receive the binary branching structure in (3a). “Ditransitive” (that is, triadic) determiners like every . . . except or more . . . than receive a structure containing a phonetically null “light determiner” that triggers D-raising (3b).
Here Pro is a pro-predicate argument corresponding to the scope, whose content is given by the phrase that DP is sister to at LF (4a–d).
The same analysis applies straightforwardly to examples with a quantified DP object. Again, note that in (3a, b) (set) arguments appearing higher in structure (as expressed by c-command) receive Ë-roles correspondingly higher on the thematic hierarchy.